TECHNET Archives

January 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jerry Cupples <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 12 Jan 1998 10:45:14 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Douglas H Bennett said:

>I have to agree with Werner with regard to the combined use of IR and
>Forced Convection.  I am also interested in why Eddie is prejudiced against
>the combination of IR and Convection.

If by "predjudiced" you mean he decided what sort of furnace to buy without
waiting to see what the Fraunhofer Institute said, then he is not alone.

>At Heraeus, we commisioned a study at Fraunhofer Institute in Berlin on the
>effects of various percentage combinations of forced convection and IR.  As
>a result of the study we have modified our full forced convection oven
>design.  (Yes, Heraeus also manufactures reflow and curing ovens in
>addition to solder paste and glues)

And numerous other companies. Yours is the only one I have heard recently
make any statement other than maximal forced convection is the best way to
go.

>Without going into a lot of detail, the report showed that a percentage
>combination of IR and Forced Convection helped the reflow process
>especially when it came to large mass components.  The critical part
>however is that the IR must be well controlled.  If the IR system drifts
>over the course of a day then the process will be non-repeatable.

This is the apparent difficulty of using IR heating. It is of course true
that any normal furnace operating at solder reflow temperatures will have a
measurable amount of IR emission, but the trend for the last 8-10 years has
been to maximize the convective heating.

Generally, I consider radiant heating to be a non-equilibrium process. In
other words, the preference would be to have a process that will only be
capable of bringing the work to a set temperature. Without a lot of detail,
a radiant heating process, a la the kitchen toaster, may give you a bit of
dark toast if the timing is wrong. But then, I have never been an
institution.

>If anyone has any questions about the report or the Heraeus Ovens, please
>contact me directly.

Thanks, but here we replaced two furnaces in 1997. The old equipment used
passive panel IR emitters, and the new equipment features fan forced
heaters. The delta T achieved is markedly better, with shorter heated zones
and faster conveyor rates. But next time I buy a furnace, I will try to
keep all this in mind. Your point sounds interesting, if unconventional.


regards,


Jerry Cupples
Interphase Corporation
Dallas, TX USA
http://www.iphase.com/

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2