DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

January 1998

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Davis Ben <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 8 Jan 1998 13:13:14 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Greetings fellow designers...

A question has come up concerning the need for pads on both sides of the
board for a plated via.  We have slipped and let a via get placed under
a metalized part (big OOPS).  Now we are in the fix it phase and would
rather not take the time or money to scrap and re-layout the board.
What we would rather do is remove the pad on the top side of the board.

I have always believed the need for pads on both sides of the board is
mostly a fabrication issue to insure good/complete plating on the hole
wall (at least on vias).

My questions are:

1) What problems arise if the top pad is removed from the artwork?

2) What problems would there be if the pad was removed after
fabrication?

3) Any other suggestions.


Thanks in advance for your help and responses.

Ben Davis
[log in to unmask]

##############################################################
IPC Designers Council Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE DESIGNERCOUNCIL <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF DESIGNERCOUNCIL
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2