TECHNET Archives

December 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Warhelere" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 8 Dec 1997 05:38:29 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (35 lines)
Having read November's CircuitTree, I seek the aid of few good, erudite
TechNetters.

Grant that I know nothing -- Please forgive my naive questions.

The problem with direct chip attachment is seemingly defined as not
having a known good die (KGD).

1)  When one is mounting a die on an interposer, would the interposer
not face the same dilemma?  In other words what does the interposer do
to accomodate the absence of a known good die that the PCB could not?
(One can see after attachment the features are scaled up for PCB
attachment, though.)

2) Where is the crux of the problem?  Is it assembly or
design/construction ability at the PCB stage?

Tie Me, Fly Me, Whip Me, Flame Me for Asking
Thanks,
J. Warhelere

[log in to unmask]

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2