TECHNET Archives

December 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Chan, Marcelo" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 5 Dec 1997 15:42:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (198 lines)
Hi Bill,
I have been advised by Enthone in the past not to bake boards as it
removes the organic coating...even at 80 deg. C for 2 hours is
detrimental.... This was in relation to Entek 106A

Marcelo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 1997 2:36 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [TN] entek plus process
>
>      Matthew:
>
>      From my perspective, the question that needs to be addressed
> FIRST is
>      where in the process is the ENTEK applied to the board.
>
>      1) ENTEK BEFORE or AFTER Bare Board Test
>
>         By itself, ENTEK is an insulator. Therefore, if it is applied
> PRIOR
>         to bare board testing, the bare board test probes can create
> "false
>         opens" due to residue buildup on the tips of the probes.  This
>         might indicate that ENTEK AFTER bare board test would be
> better.
>
>         On the other hand, a mild microetch is used to prepare the
> surface
>         prior to ENTEK application. If the dip process is used and the
>         microetch is fresh (i.e. strong solution), excessive etching
> can
>         result.  This can result in circumferential barrel voids at
> the
>         knee of the holes, where the copper is the thinnest.  If ENTEK
> is
>         applied AFTER TEST, this type of defect will not be discovered
>         until the board has been populated with expensive components.
>
>         Some people subscribe to the policy "NO chemical operation
> shall be
>         performed AFTER bare board testing".  Each vendor's process
> and
>         controls must be evaluated to assess the likelihood for this
> type
>         of failure.
>
>      2) In-line vs. Batch
>
>         In my opinion, in-line would be better and more repeatable, if
> the
>         total volume of boards that the vendor processes warrant the
>         equipment expense.  Properly managed, the dip process will
> work.
>
>      3) "Spotted" Boards:
>
>         Another "problem" to look out for is moisture spotting during
>         shipment.  ENTEK uses a DI rinse in the process and, if vias
> are
>         small (0.013" dia.), moisture can be trapped inside the barrel
> of
>         those vias.  Placing the "drip-dried" board in a plastic bag
> for
>         shipment, can result in residual moisture STILL residing in
> the
>         bag.  Shipment of the boards to the final destination
> (shipping
>         vibration, change in temperature, etc.) causes the moisture to
>         migrate to the inside surface of the bag and, in turn, back
> onto
>         the board.  The thickness of the ENTEK on the board will be
> reduced
>         where there is intimate moisture contact. The appearance looks
> like
>         "water spots" on a drinking glass.  They COULD result in
> localized
>         ENTEK "voids" and potentially cause solderability problems, if
> the
>         boards are left on the shelf for an extended period of time.
>
>         One test for "dryness" of a board is a deceptably simple one:
>
>           a)  Take a piece of colored construction paper (or the
> cardboard
>           stiffener on the back of a pad of paper) that will darken
> when
>           exposed to water and place it on a flat surface (e.g.
> table).
>
>           b)  Take a "dry" board and firmly slap the face of the board
> onto
>           the cardboard.  If it shows dark spots on the cardboard when
> the
>           fab is removed, the fab is NOT dry and could caule spotting
>           during shipment.
>
>         My suggestion is to have the boards BAKED after ENTEK to
> eliminate
>         this potential problem.
>
>      I advocate the use of ENTEK for fine pitch QFP designs, because
> of the
>      resultant pad flatness, as compared with HASL.  However, it does
> have
>      some "side effects" to watch out for.  It is NOT the "panacea for
> all
>      ills", but it is better than some of the alternatives in certain
>      designs.
>
>      The above opinions are my own, etc.,etc., etc.
>
>      Good Luck!
>
>      Bill Fabry
>      Plantronics, Inc.
>      (408) 458-7555
>
>      e-mail:    [log in to unmask]
>
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
> _________________________________
> Subject: [TN] entek plus process
> Author:  "TechNet Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]> at INTERNET
> Date:    12/5/97 9:58 AM
>
>
> I am getting confusing responses from a board vendor that
> uses in-line process, and from a board vendor that uses
> dipping process to coat boards with Entek Plus.
>
> What are advantage/disavantage using either process?
>
> What are problem associated with boards that were
> fabricated using dipping process?
>
> Does in-line processing provide better consistent and
> controllable coating (typ: 0.35um) than dipping process?
>
> Is there any other coating thickness measurement technique
> used by board vendors other than the sampling method
> specified by Enthone using UV spectrophotometer?
>
> What are some of inspection method employed by board
> vendors to check boards are coompletely dry prior packaging
> and shipping?
>
> advance thanks
> regards
> Matthew
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text
> in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information.
> For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.311
> ##############################################################
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional information.
> For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.311
> ##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2