TECHNET Archives

December 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"D. Rooke" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 15 Dec 1997 23:52:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
As a board manufacturer, I would be reluctant to agree to a 0.7% (.007in/in)
flatness requirement without first reviewing the design of the circuitry in
question. It is absolutely imperative that the board design is optimized for
board flatness before any  control can be achieved. I often state that the
top five causes for non-flatness in todays products are, in order of
significance:

1) board design
2) board design
3) board design
4) board design
5) all other factors

Dave Rooke
Viasystems Canada
= = = = =
>Hello, TechNetters,
>
>I was wondering what others are calling out for flatness requirements on
>double sided boards with surface mount components.  IPC-A-600 calls out
>1.5% but with a caveat that automated assembly and surface mount may
>require more stringent requirements, and refers to IPC-D-275.  The most
>stringent callout in D-275 for a 0.062" double sided board is 0.9%, and
>this is classed "reduced producibility".  If we have, say, an 8.5"x11"
>board with 0.9% bow or twist, I know we'll have difficulty running it down
>our lines.  What are others calling out, and how have your fabricators
>responded?  Some of mine are balking at 0.7%, saying it can't be held
>(would have to be sorted, possibly increasing cost) because of variability
>in the base material.  I think 0.7% is met most of the time, but every once
>in a while...
>
>Thanks for any input.
>
>*****************************
>* Pat Bailey                *
>* Supplier Quality Engineer *
>* Zytec Corporation         *
>* 1425 E. Bridge Street     *
>* Redwood Falls, MN  56283  *
>*                           *
>* phone 507 637-2966 x355   *
>* fax   507 644-3720        *
>* e-mail [log in to unmask]     *
>*****************************
>
>##############################################################
>TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>##############################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
>##############################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional information.
>For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.311
>##############################################################
>
>

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2