TECHNET Archives

December 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Davis, Mary" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:36:56 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
I apologize if this question has been covered previously.  IPC
J-STD-001B states that assemblies shall contain less than 1.56
micrograms/sq.cm. NaCl equivalent ionic or ionizable flux residue.
There is additional wording about other methods and comparing
sensitivities but I am unclear as to whether or not the equivalence
factors in the Naval Materials Research Report 3-78 can be applied.  In
that report the 1.56 micrograms/sq.in. translates to different
acceptance limits for different instruments:

2.2 micrograms/sq. cm. for Omegameter
3.1 micrograms/sq. cm for Ionograph
5.1 micrograms/sq. cm for Ion Chaser

Can IPC J-STD-001B be interpreted to include these historical
equivalence factors?

Thanks in advance for any help you can give me.

Mary Davis
Hughes Aircraft Co.
Naval & Maritime Systems

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2