TECHNET Archives

December 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David D Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 12 Dec 1997 07:08:40 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (94 lines)
Hello Alan - here are some comments to your inquiries:

Are all bar solders alike?  All claim to exceed the requirements of
J-Std-006.

** My experience has said that if the solder bar meets the requirements of
JSTD 006 (perviously QQ-S-571) that there isn't much difference. We did
recently go through an experience of procuring two different solder bar
part numbers from a vendor (both the same alloy and both met 006) where one
bar caused substantially more pot drossing. A SEM analysis revealed that
one bar contained a small precentage of zinc.

Are there any substantial differences between ultra-pure, virgin, etc.?

** IMHO, no. Some solder vendors claim that the ultra pure bar has better
fluidity, less surface tension, etc. Once you run a day's worth of
production through your wave solder machine you have "contaminated" the
original solder bar alloy chemical composition enough that I believe the
claimed advantages of the solder bar purity is lost (and why pay more for a
one day advantage). Some solder vendors have been working with alloy
additions that lower solder drossing characteristics (one example is adding
Phosphorus) that some people have told me has made a difference in their
process.
Any advantage/disadvantage between 60/40 & 63/37?

** Both are near eutectec solder alloys used by lots of folks with equally
good results. The Sn63 alloy has a slightly smaller pastey range but in a
wave solder pot with many, many assemblies going through it I again think
that it would be tough to show a statistical difference.
Is there in easy method to evaluate the solder performance other than
dumping 1000+ pounds of solder and re-filling with the new solder?

** I have seen some nonreleased data on a Sn63 versus Sn60 solder alloy
comparison using a min-wave solder pot and small test coupons (the results
were inconclusive - a larger sampling size was needed) which is one method
of avoiding the dumping of a big pot. Sorry, but if you really want to do a
good comparison your idea of using a full size wave solder machine/pot
would give the most useful (and applicable) results. Good Luck.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]





[log in to unmask] on 12/03/97 09:34:59 AM

Please respond to [log in to unmask]; Please respond to
      [log in to unmask]

To:   [log in to unmask]
cc:    (bcc: David D Hillman/CedarRapids/Collins/Rockwell)
Subject:  [TN] Bar Solder




A few questions on bar solder used in the wave solder process . . .

Are all bar solders alike?  All claim to exceed the requirements of
J-Std-006.
Are there any substantial differences between ultra-pure, virgin, etc.?
Any advantage/disadvantage between 60/40 & 63/37?
Is there in easy method to evaluate the solder performance other than
dumping 1000+ pounds of solder and re-filling with the new solder?
Or does it just come down to cost (per pound)?
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2