Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet Mail Forum. |
Date: | Wed, 5 Nov 1997 23:36:46 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dhawan,
The depanelization method for the Array's lies solely on the type of
product you are manufacturing and designing and the component types
and layout (both sides).
For example, if you are assembly Smart Cards or DIMM Modules then
Routing and Scoring is preferred. Since the routing is performed at
the fab house it does not pose stresses on the solder joints. Manual
depanelization is not preferred, but also depends on the design. I
highly recommmend you use a Semi-automated or automated depanelizer,
such as a CAB Maestro. Which ever method you use, I recommended
performing a strain gage test to determine the amount of stress
applied to components solder joints near the card edge.
Typically the score moves the X-Y stresses from the top surface
towards the center, depending on the amount of material residual. The
Semi-automated depanelizer will seperate the cards via Pizza cutters
(top and bottom) or one on top. This method is clean and minimizes
the stresses associated with manual depanelizing.
At all possible avoid manual depanelizing, unless is is all through
hole card. I would also avoid tab or breakaway slots for the two
products mentioned. These methods are ok should the end product
design be robust.
Scoring is not also applicable when using Smart cards (aka PCMCIA).
The type I, II, III cans offer little room for the mechanical
engineering aspects. You must account for the residual matrial left
following scoring in your X and Y dimensions. We have overcome these
obstacals, but still something to consider.
Hope this helps.
John Gulley
Inet Inc.
972-578-3928
"A Smarter Vision"
www.inetinc.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: [TN] Breaking of tabs
Author: "Dhawan; Ashok" <[log in to unmask]> at Internet
|
|
|