TECHNET Archives

November 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Natalie Sharp <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 7 Nov 1997 13:04:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I would like to know what approach companies are taking for inspecting the
paste printing process.

Are you using an in-line system?
What equipment are you using?
What are you inspecting - height, area, and volume?
100% inspection of every board built?
Inspect only prototypes and random sampling of mature product?
Product complexity - ultra fine pitch (0.4 mm), BGA's, micro BGA's?
Product volume and mix?
Benefits - defect reduction and rework time savings?

Please send your comments via email to the following address.

[log in to unmask]

Thanks for your input.

Natalie Sharp
Process Engineer
Newbridge Networks
Kanata, ON

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2