TECHNET Archives

October 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 29 Oct 1997 14:39:32 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (370 bytes) , text/plain (896 bytes)
In the IPC soldering flux spec J-STD-004 there are a couple of
non quantitative tests, IPC-TM-650 method 2.3.33 Silver Chromate
for Halides and method 2.3.35.1 Fluoride spot test. If these
tests are pass then the flux is Halide and Flouride free. If
they fail then there are quantitative tests that can be used to
determine the Halide and Fluoride concentration. My question is



         what is the limit of detection of these qualitative tests? What          concentration of halide or Fluoride in the flux would just pass          the silver chromate or fluride spot test?               I'm planning on using a water wash flux that passes these          tests for placing solder balls on silicon wafers. My semiconductor          assembly experience with die attach materials and epoxy          encapsulants makes me very wary of halides. How concerned should I          be if the Aluminium bond pad is protected by good subsequent          metallisation and chip passivation? Data sheets for most          semiconductor assembly materials will give ppm of Chloride, etc          with "good" values being below 10 or 20. Is there a direct          comparison possible with fluxes?          regards, Jeremy Drake          Design to Distribution ltd          Stoke on Trent          England

ATOM RSS1 RSS2