TECHNET Archives

October 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Long, Jim HSD" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 28 Oct 1997 11:51:10 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Our company is an aerospace supplier, we have traditionally imposed
MIL-STD-202, Method 208 for solderability of component leads. The latest
revision of 208, H rev, points to using ANSI/J-STD-002. Is anyone in the
industry using the J-STD-002 document exclusively without reference to
MIL-STD-202?
Since our older documentation specifies MIL-STD-202 we would like to
change the documentation to specify the J-STD-002 and the new methods
for testing described in J-STD-002.
How are other industry companies addressing this change from MIL-STDs to
Industry Standards for solderability. It would appear that MIL-STD-202
will be replaced by the industry standard, so why not use it
exclusively?

Jim Long
Hamilton Standard Electronics
[log in to unmask]

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2