TECHNET Archives

October 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Phillip E. Hinton" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 1997 13:53:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Sheila,

Intermetallics are not a problem with this system, but if you used the
95SnSb5 for the reason that you want a higher melting temperature 235-240
versus the 179 deg C melting temperature for the Sn62 you may be defeating
the purpose as the melting point will be lowered and in localized areas will
be about 180 deg. C.  If you did not have a reason for using the Sn95Sb5
material to began with, why not use the Sn62 initially.  I have not seen any
improvement when cycling the Sn55Sn5 as compared to the Sn62; however, some
literature indicates a better life at higher temperatures for The Sn95Sn5.  I
have seen it most used for sequential soldering, where you do not want to
melt one joint while doing the other.

Phil Hinton

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2