Hi Werner, many thanks for your response. You made some good points
here. I repeated the details of the att. memo in my note. I supose what
I am really talking about is a stress screen on populated cards, to
accelerate the Early Life part of the Bath Tub curve and therefore
improve the overall reliability figure. I think the 'experimental'
results would really be 'experience' results and come from anyone who
had previously implemented this Bathtub acceleration, OR who had
implemented one of your ESS's to find a problem. Perhaps the profile
used SHOULD take the worst possible useage conditions and add some
overhead for 'Gaurdband'. Thanks again Werner. Any more input from the
TechNet now I have clarified my problem? Cheers, Steve.
([log in to unmask])

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################