TECHNET Archives

October 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Assy: Water Soluble Flux
From:
Jan Satterfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:56:03 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines) 
I need a quick education.  The company I have recently hired on at,
would like to immediately change over from RMA flux to Water Soluble
flux for both SMT and thru-hole.  Most of our work is military. It has
been several years since I've researched this topic.

Are SIR tests still required to prove your cleaning methods?
Are SIR tests only required for government contracts?
Can Water Soluble fluxes be used on stranded wire?
Which is a better cleaning process for Water Soluble flux, Batch systems
or in-line systems?
Have most government contractors switched to WS Flux or still using RMA?

Thanks in advance for all responses.

Jan Satterfield
Sr. Process Engineer
L3 Communications

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2