Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet Mail Forum. |
Date: | Fri, 31 Oct 1997 04:06:36 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
All,
1. Are a majority of the Manufacturers or OEMs receiving components
through Receiving with parts that have date codes as old as 9531?
2. Does anyone check the date codes of components as part of their
Incoming Inspection?
3. If older than 12 months, how are you approaching the solderbility
issues? Are you dispositioning the parts for rework, return to
vendor or Use As Is?
4. Is it typical to receive components with date codes older around
9531, 9644, 9540, etc from the suppliers/distributers?
5. I've identified that some components that are very old (typ. older
than 12 months) are having solderability defects (very random). I
am having my Incoming Inspection identify the old components
through an Expired Parts List. This sometimes helps me when
identifying defects in mfg. Does anyone have a better method?
6. I'm not sure thie method is benefiting like I would want it to.
Any input is appreciated.
John Gulley
Inet Inc.
"A Smarter Vision"
www.inetinc.com
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################
|
|
|