TECHNET Archives

August 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Tyler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 6 Aug 1997 12:51:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hello Technet
I'm having discussions with some of our PCB suppliers concerning the IPC
"B" coupon spec. which requires the holes to be drilled with the smallest
hole size used on the associated PCB.  The problem is that hole sizes have
been decreasing and we no longer feel that the smallest hole is
representative of the board.  Not only that but we (the end user) are
finding it increasingly difficult to microsection these coupons for quality
assurance purposes.  It is very difficult to get to the center of holes
below .030 inches.  We are using a PC Met Jr. to fixture the coupons for
grinding and an Ecomet to do the grinding.  So the question is, should we
spec. the most numerous component holes to be drilled instead, is the IPC
considering a different spec. or should we consider other equipment?  If
there is anyone who has encountered (and overcome) this problem I would
appreciate the feedback.

Thanks
David Tyler
Inspection Services
Teradyne Inc.
179 Lincoln St.
Boston, MA 02111


ATOM RSS1 RSS2