concerning rs274x format. as the supervisor of the C.A.M.
     department at my company, I can tell you that we prefer this format.
     by having the apertures imbedded in the file, you reduce the chances
     of an error being made. when apertures have to be entered manually,
     you run the risk of a typing error, such as a 5 being entered instead
     of 50, or an innerlayer thermal being entered as a clearance pad.
     rs274x allows us to just read in the file directly, sometimes you may
     have as many as 50 separate apertures to enter, would you rather be
     able to just read the file in, or do you want someone to sit and type
     them in, one at a time.
              i hope this is of some help to you

                                   ernie smith

                                   product engineer
                                   Electropac Co. Inc.

               [log in to unmask]





--simple boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="RFC822.TXT"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="RFC822.TXT"

From: ADMINISTRATOR (cc:Mail Link to SMTP Administrator)