TECHNET Archives

August 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 21 Aug 1997 09:49:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
     Marti,
     
     From how you describe the defect, its seems you have a larger problem 
     on your hands.  You may want to elaborate on the type and degree of  
     defect (i.e., 1-2 per QFP, random throughout the assy, at the edges, 
     in the center, 1 QFP in particular, etc).  Look at the following 
     variables:
     
     1. Possible IMC (intermetallic compound) present on the SMT lands.  It 
        sounds as if the solder is wetting properly to the lead and that    
        the land has some type of contaminate(s).  Any thin and porous SnPb 
        may exhibit Cu5Sn6 crystal growth (oxidation).  This will limit the 
        solderabilty.  To what degree, I'm not sure.  I have found this     
        problem in the past and have methods for correcting.
     
        Sample PCB date codes, XRF measurements of SnPb lands, etc.
     
     2. Some QFP packages will give you problems, depending how the package 
        is rotated on the PCB.  Some leads may be heatsinked to a large     
        plane on the die, causing it not to solder.
     
     3. One defect that I am having difficulties identifying is lead       
        coplanarity.  Is the lead being damaged at the supplier, 
        distributer, kitting or on the line?  I don't know and have put off 
        investigating.  Any suggestions on this topic would be helpful.
     
     I beleive the problem lies with item 1 and that 2/3 are other minor 
     variables.
     
     
     With regards to design, remember that IPC-SM-782 is a design standard 
     for which to begin your designs and does not apply to everyone's 
     product.  I am not sure how your CAD/CAM group approached the layout 
     of the PCB, but here's a suggestion.  SMT Plus and the like, are great 
     design books but found land layouts did not always match the 
     manufacturers suggested QFP patterns which led to assembly P&P 
     problems.  I had our design group transition the whole library to 
     IPC-SM-782 with following suggestion.
     
     w=width, p=pitch, l=land
     
     W=P/2     
     
     L=W*5
     
     i.e.,      W=.012/2
                W=.006
                L=.006*5
                L=.030
                LAND= .006x.030
     
     I'm not sure where I got this basic formula, but have been using it 
     for many years.  It was recently used on our PCMCIA design with 450 
     components in a 5.2inē area with great success.
     
     With regards to solderpaste volume, the above will help some, however 
     the thickness of your stencil is big contributer.  Are you using Laser 
     or Chem etch stencils?  Are the stencils chemical polished?  What is 
     you soldermask thickness with respect to stencil thickness?  Is the 
     stencil to pad thickness ratio correct?  There are many variables that 
     need addressing here.  I can help you more of line if needed.
     
     
     Look for the following for bridging.  Make sure your using the right 
     solderpaste particle size, viscosity. minimize slump (temp/RH), 
     
     
     John Gulley
     1255 W. 15th St.
     Plano, TX 75075
     972.578.3928
     
     


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: [TECHNET] Assy & Design SMT
Author:  "Tully; Marti (AZ15)" <[log in to unmask]> at Internet


ATOM RSS1 RSS2