TECHNET Archives

August 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 4 Aug 1997 07:26:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
  John..
         I'm still surprised! We have been designing 12-14 layer (standard)
   smt designs for about a zillion years, maybe not quite a zillion, but
   a looonnng time and no vendor has ever requested that the inner layer
   pads be larger. In fact, unless I am looking at the formula/chart in
  the Mil and IPC specs incorrectly, the minimum annular ring requirement
  for internal is .001/.002 mils vs .002/.004 mils for external layers.
  Therefore, by definition, your external pads should be larger. What
  am I missing???
                                       Regards,
                                                  Bob


ATOM RSS1 RSS2