TECHNET Archives

August 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet Mail Forum<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 28 Aug 1997 23:29:53 -0400
X-cc:
Reply-To:
"TechNet Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Steve,
      In addition to agreeing with Jim's reply, I would like to add one other
caution based on your comment about Receiving Inspection.  If your company is
still paying receiving inspectors to 100% inspect the incoming boards, they
are wasting their money, delaying incoming inventory and creating a false
sense of security.  If the incoming quality is that unstable they are buying
from the wrong shops.  If you are receiving a high percentage of x-outs,
inspect the x-outs long enough to learn where your supplier's problems are.
 Work with them to improve their process or buy from a shop that better fits
the technology level of your boards.
       Norm Dill


ATOM RSS1 RSS2