TECHNET Archives

August 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-To:
Paul Stolar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Aug 1997 08:56:07 -0700
Reply-To:
"TechNet Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Frank Hinojos <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Getek
From:
Frank Hinojos <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
TechNet Mail Forum<[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
     Our experience has been that Getek processes the same way through the
     surface mount process in high and low volumes.  It behaves just like
     FR4 through the entire process.

     Frank Hinojos
     Watkins-Johnson Co.


     ______________________________ Reply Separator
     _________________________________
     Subject: [TECHNET] Getek
     Author:  Paul Stolar <[log in to unmask]> at INTERNET
     Date:    8/22/97 9:49 AM


     What effect will Getek have on our SMT processes, as compared to standard
     FR4? I don't really expect any, but it would be nice to know.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2