Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 97 10:19:18 PST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
How come chemical vendors almost always emphasize that their oxides
are converted/reduced? Is the reduction process a relatively new
technology?
If so, before the reduction process is available, how did PCB shops
prevent pink ring formation?
The reason I ask is that, since there is a "pink ring" solution -
reduction of oxide, whenever there is pink ring occurence, one would
point at the reduction process by first instinct, forgiving other
possible pink ring causes. We once faced an extremely painful pink
ring crisis, and were able to end it by improving the oxide reduction
process. However, during the crisis, I found out that I can separate
the oxide-coated copper from the prepreg by using a knife. It was that
easy even without thermal-shocking the board. And after the separation
there was not even a bit of oxide seen on the prepreg side. I
considered this as an evidence of poor lamination.
Although we solve the pink ring by oxide reduction, I think may be
we might not have the problem in the first place if the lamination is
in perfect contition.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|