TECHNET Archives

July 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 16 Jul 97 21:56:49 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
          I agree wholeheartedly with Werner's statement and
          conclusion that the possible gain in reliability is not
          worth the loss in manufacturability.  In some cases, if the
          non-functional pads are required to be left on, drill stack
          height is reduced and this impacts board cost.  The round
          robin study is also quite outdated (I believe the late
          '80's), and was done at a time when small hole drilling was
          new to everyone.  There have been several process
          enhancements since then.  Hmmmmm....maybe it's time to do a
          new study?!?
          Tom Coyle
          Field Services Engineer
          HADCO Corporation

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


ATOM RSS1 RSS2