Phil,  that is exactly my concern.  The customer in this instance, is looking
for a higher temperature operating joint.  Many operations later in the
process call for high temperature applications.  Enviromentally there is no
real concern at this point.


THANKS
Jamey
*** Reply to note of 07/11/97 00:53
From: [log in to unmask]
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 00:09:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Solder compatibility

Jamey,

You do not have to worry about intemetallics, but if you are using the Sn96
to raise  the melting temperature of your solder joint, you are defeatiing
the purpoose because once the joint contains 2.5% lead you form a eutectic
mixture and you have chunks of tin/silver solder being held together with a
mortar of Sn 63.  The Sn 63 of course has a melting point of near 180 Deg C
and the higher melting point of 221 deg C for the Sn 96 is no longer doing
you any good.  Even 1% lead in the joint will lower the point where some
liquid solder may be present by about 10 degrees.

If you are only soldering the components/ boards in a wave solder and trying
to keep the lead low to be environmentally friendly, there is not an
intermetallic or melting temperature problem except now you joints will look
very grainy and not cosmetically happy, because you will no longer have a
eutectic and some portions will solidify before others.  Eventually you whole
wave solder operation will look grainy and like you have a rash of cold
solder joints.

It is suggested that if you want to maintain the integrity of the Sn96, that
you use OSP or electroless nickle/immersion gold as a final finish.

Phil Hinton

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


---- End of mail text







Additional SMTP headers from original mail item follow:
Received: from simon.ipc.org by E-MAIL.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with TCP;
   Fri, 11 Jul 97 00:53:35 EDT
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
    id XAA02307; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 23:30:43 -0700
Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 23:30:43 -0700
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
   id m0wmWrI-000BjpC; Thu, 10 Jul 97 22:59 CDT
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-Message-ID: <"G--CC.0.x2R.3-Qnp"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/13918
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************