TECHNET Archives

July 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0wmRzq-000BjfC; Thu, 10 Jul 97 17:47 CDT
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 10 Jul 1997 15:57:55 -0700
Precedence:
list
Reply-To:
cc:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
Priority:
Normal
TO:
"Lepsche, Thomas G (NM75)" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Mon Jul 14 08:
34:57 1997
X-Status:
X-Loop:
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/13913
Resent-Message-ID:
<"uscFw.0.VON.6QMnp"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Vickie Chapman <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
>From willli Thu Jul 10 17:
47:55 1997
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (102 lines)
This is a repost of a question I posted several weeks ago. I have yet to receive 
a single response! Now I see a similar question (see below) posted by Thomas 
Lepsche... C'mon technetters, someone out there must be doing this stuff! Or, 
can anyone suggest a better discussion venue for this?

Still hoping for some response.... please???

Thanks,

V. Chapman
----------------------------------------------------------------

I am currently investigating various types of non-contact process monitoring for 
solder joint inspection. This includes Xray laminography, transmission Xray, and 
various types of automated optical inspection.

If you have purchased or investigated any of this type of equipment, I am 
interested in any words of wisdom,comments, experiences, etc. that you're 
willing to share with me.  More specifically, my questions are:

1. Various AOI vendors use different light sources, from programmable banks of 
LED's(Control Automation, Theta Group), to 3-color incandescent lighting 
(Omron), to infrared (MVP). Any ideas on pro's and con's of these different 
schemes?

2. In the real world, how good are these machines at recognizing good vs. bad 
solder joints? (I already know what the vendors say!) 

3. How much programming support is needed? (expressed in # of engineers, # of 
techs, etc.)

4. If you have purchased any of this equipment, how did you cost-justify it? Are 
you using it in-line or off-line? At what point in your process? Has it proven 
cost-effective?

5. If we're only doing a very small amount of BGA, is the extra $$$ to go with 
Xray laminography really worth it?

6. Is anyone using automated inspection with human (rather than machine) defect 
recognition?

Thanks!

--------------------------------------------------------------------



On Thu, 10 Jul 1997 14:49:54 -0700 Lepsche, Thomas G (NM75) wrote:

> From: Lepsche, Thomas G (NM75) <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 14:49:54 -0700
> Subject: Test Strategy
> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>,
>      "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> 
> 
> A major change in test strategy has been propose for our factory and I
> am looking for comments addressing pro's and con's. The strategy has
> surfaced due to the increased density of late 90's design density and
> availability of the higher density, lower inspectable, higher test cost
> components and assembly strategies.(BGA's, COB, Chipscale, etc.)
> 	 The major change is to put a full function x-ray capability (x-ray
> Laminography) in front of an in-circuit tester to verify 100 % solder
> joint integrity, orientation of part placement, presence of part,
> configuration right part, Etc. This will assure that solder integrity
> and placement are 100% and greatly reduce defects found down stream at
> final LRU acceptance or Burn-In.
> 
> 	We are:	High Mix 
> 		Low Volume
> 		Moderate to High Complexity
> 		60% Thru Hole, 30% SMT, 10% Mixed Technology
> 
> 
> Thanks for your time invested in response	
> Semper Fi
> Tom   
> 
> ***************************************************************************
> * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
> ***************************************************************************
> * To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
> * with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
> ***************************************************************************
> * If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
> * Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
> ***************************************************************************
> 



***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


ATOM RSS1 RSS2