 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 08 Jul 1997 16:17:03 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| >From willli Tue Jul 8 14: |
57:55 1997 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Content-Disposition: |
inline |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Jul 9 11: |
04:33 1997 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"eTePC2.0.6H3.hkfmp"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wlgOC-000BjYC; Tue, 8 Jul 97 14:57 CDT |
| X-Mailer: |
Novell GroupWise 4.1 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thomas,
Silkscreening text is not a very precise process. As circuit
board processing goes, it is kind of sloppy. In general, keeping the text
stroke width below 20% of the text height has served me well over the
years. Of course, as you get to the smaller text, a finer stroke width
looks nicer. Also most everybody can screen a 10mil (strokewidth) line.
You can easily go down to .1" high text using this method. Smaller text,
.06 or .07" requires some experimentation so as to avoid text that looks
like squashed bugs. All text fonts (and all CAE systems) are different.
I hope this helps.
John Swinehart
BFGoodrich Avionics Systems, Inc.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
