TECHNET Archives

July 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
>From willli Thu Jul 17 14:
03:50 1997
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="openmail-part-00602d6d-00000001"
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jul 97 15:17:40 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/14089
TO:
[log in to unmask]
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0wovpg-000BjuC; Thu, 17 Jul 97 14:03 CDT
Resent-Message-ID:
<"PZu6l3.0.BXG.qncpp"@ipc>
From [log in to unmask] Mon Jul 21 15:
56:34 1997
From:
[log in to unmask]
Mime-Version:
1.0
X-Openmail-Hops:
1
Subject:
DES:Conductor design rule
Message-Id:
<H0000317002ccb19@MHS>
Parts/Attachments:
cc:Mail (228 bytes) , text/plain (17 bytes) 
I need to know if there is any design rule that tells what will be the 
preferred connecting angle between a conductor and a pad.  If the conductor 
connects the pad in angle (i.e <90degrees), it will cause problems?

Enid Dávila




TO: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2