TECHNET Archives

June 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
>From willli Fri Jun 27 09:
55:42 1997
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Jun 1997 10:51:55 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/13685
TO:
Technet <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jun 27 11:
01:32 1997
Resent-Message-ID:
<"M6o5d1.0.8KH.THzip"@ipc>
Subject:
FAB: Copper foil compatability
Message-id:
<[log in to unmask]>
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0whcQo-000BjlC; Fri, 27 Jun 97 09:55 CDT
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
X-Mailer:
Mail*Link SMTP for Quarterdeck Mail; Version 4.0.0
From:
"Saccomanno, Tom" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
Technetters,
Does anyone have any information concerning an incompatability between copper
clad teflon material and electroless nickel/immersion gold plating?
Any information or insight would be appreciated.
Tom

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2