TECHNET Archives

June 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0wekE0-000Bk4C; Thu, 19 Jun 97 11:38 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 19 Jun 1997 12:48:29 -0400 (EDT)
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 24 16:
28:57 1997
Resent-From:
>From willli Thu Jun 19 11:
38:44 1997
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/13559
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"T27Xn.0.9mH.x1Mgp"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Graham brings up a good point.  When a stringent end-item ionic cleanliness
requirement is levied, it can be very difficult to meet consistently if you
have either absorbed contaminants in the solder mask or laminate, or if you
have a less than fully cured mask, a ROSE test will be hard  to pass.  If the
mask is not fully cured prior to HASL, they tend to absorb more flux and
leach it out in a subsequent ROSE test.

Doug Pauls
CSL

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


ATOM RSS1 RSS2