Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jun 1997 09:47:43 -0400 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 18 08: |
54:41 1997 |
Resent-Sender: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
>From willli Wed Jun 18 08: |
45:06 1997 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ZqPNQ2.0.e0H.uO-fp"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0weL29-000BjtC; Wed, 18 Jun 97 08:44 CDT |
X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello All
We too have experienced this conundrum for many years. We have been
marginally successful in avoiding it
by:
1) For products that include SMT and wave solder (last process
performed), leaving the vias "open" (thus filled by wave) has worked
well. However, not all products have these characteristics.
2) Employing mechanical overclamped fixturing has worked well. The extra
fixture cost is amortized over volume through lower circuit cost (no
extra $$ for plugging). However, high IO BGAs cause a tremendous
concentration of localized test points which we know will overstress the
BGA joints during test using clamps to oppose the pin forces (i.e. the
module bends too much).
3) We employ plugging vias the same way others have. This process can be
costly and is not a technically robust process as others have noted. The
only items we've seen with it other than what has already been mentioned
are:
Plugged vias unavoidably yield raised bumps (some as high as 2 mils)
which interfere with stencil printing fine pitch parts (by creating
localized non-planarity of stencil surface). Eventually paste winds up
on the bottom of the stencil and gets transferred to subsequent
production.
When vias are placed under SMT devices, we have seen plugs expand
severely and actually create opens by lifting the devices. We have SEMs
of this.
I see this as an issue that is not going away and current solutions are
not entirely adequate.
>
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|