TECHNET Archives

May 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Max Bernhardt "<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 May 1997 12:21:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (93 lines)
There is a web site that goes by RAC (Reliability Analysis Center) on
the internet that may have some of data you are looking for.  I have a
problem with 883 because current production processes should be much
more reliable than buying a 883 part.  I am not a statistician, but I am
sure that you can find some that could prove my hypothesis correct.  A
lot of the methods in it should be portable to other testing designs
though.  My biggest problem with it is the visual inspections that
pretty much kill the reliability of the part as compared to todays
systems.  In addition, the more handling you do of the components the
more likely your going to screw them up somehow.  The final thing that I
find hard to take is getting hammered for plastic IC's versus
hermetically sealed components.  Other than that, I think that 883 makes
a good guide to reliability questions.

Max Bernhardt
Component Engineer.
Woodward Governor Co.

 ----------
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: re: Electronic system/assembly reliability
Date: Friday, May 09, 1997 12:20PM


Comments By: Glenn Pelkey@Quality@HCO
Originally To: internet[[log in to unmask]]
Originally From: Glenn Pelkey@Quality@HCO
Original Date:  5/8/97  8:45 AM
Comments:



 -------------------------[Original Message]--------------------------

	If you haven't abandoned all military documents, you could use as a
reference Mil-Hdbk-781 for systems and Mil-Std-883 for components.  They
give
test methods and analysis of data.
	Or, there is the JEDEC series of standards (JESD22-xxxx-x) available
from EIA and Doug already mentioned Bellcore.  It's always good to
reference
your source when developing a test plan.

Glenn Pelkey
Quality/Reliability Engineer
Maxtek Components Corp.

| ----------------------  Original Message Follows  |
 ----------------------
| Could someone help me finding suitable reliability test
| methods or =
| standards for reliability characterization of
| electronic/system =
| assemblies ?
|
| I've heard of Mil-hdbk-217, but this is used for
| reliability prediction =
| (from design) and not for reliability evaluation of the
| assembly.
|
| Thank you in advance for anyone willing to answer.

************************************************************************
***
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList
v3.05 *
************************************************************************
***
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>
 *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.
 *
************************************************************************
***
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact
 *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]
 *
************************************************************************
***

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


ATOM RSS1 RSS2