 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wOQZ0-000BoPC; Mon, 5 May 97 11:24 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<bergda> |
| Date: |
Mon, 5 May 1997 11:24:26 -0500 (CDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue May 6 11: |
14:01 1997 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"M6LGj.0.iVI._cWRp"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9705051130.I85520-0100000@ipc> |
| cc: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Todd, there isn't such a document yet but we would be interested and
developing an industry standard for this. We are starting a similar
effort for the assembly side of thing, and hope to have a meeting this
summer to lay out the draft. I would be interested in hearing from any
participants that would be interested in developing a standardized list
of defects for the PCB or for PCA. Please email to me privately instead
of thru Technet.
Thanks
__________________________________________________
David W. Bergman, V.P. of Technical Programs
IPC
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-6135
847-509-9700 x340 Phone
847-509-9798 Fax
email [log in to unmask]
www http://www.ipc.org
---------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 1 May 1997, Todd Rodgers wrote:
> For those of you in the manufacturing of PCB's you are familiar with a
> system designed to identify rejects using codes. This makes quality
> reporting and analizing data more efficient. I am in the process of
> re-developing a re-developed reject identification system in manufacturing.
> This has been an on-going problem as simple as it may sound. If one tries
> to be to specific, you end up with 500 reject codes. On the other hand if
> you try and generalize there is trouble when it comes to root cause
> analysis, FMEA and problem solving, there is not enough specific data. I
> am looking into sub-classifying codes by process. This has not been the
> most successful project. Now I am seeking some help on this issue. Is
> there an industry document or any suggestions from the IPC that may
> speed-up this process? Does anyone have a system that they are using
> successfully that they would be willing to share? Any information on this
> subject would be helpful. Thank You!!!
>
> Todd Rogers
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ***************************************************************************
> * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
> ***************************************************************************
> * To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
> * with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
> ***************************************************************************
> * If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
> * Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
> ***************************************************************************
>
>
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
