TECHNET Archives

April 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Andrew Buonviri"<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Apr 1997 09:51:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)




>From what I understand, the signal delay attributed to trace length is
around 1.7 nanoseconds per foot... that would mean you'd need nearly 3 foot
long traces to accomplish the delay... unless I have the numbers wrong.
Seems like you're just asking for trouble with such a long trace for a
critical processor signal.

AndyB

>>>Ray Klein wrote:

I am designing a highspeed processor board and have come to the amazing
requirement of having a VERY precise delay of 4.8 +/- .25 nanoseconds.

Is this achievable in volume production printed circuit boards?
I am using FR4 medium and have 8 layers to work with. What geometries
and layering are best?

My alternatives a custom/graded silicon delay lines or, perish the thought,
an
adjustment pot. Please help!!


Ray Klein


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2