TECHNET Archives

April 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Karras, Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Apr 97 08:39:00 E
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)

Hi All,

There have been some discussion between the performance of PTH vs. SMT style 
packages. Some of the power and dig guys feel that the PTH stuff, in some 
cases, respond better than the SMT devices. I say thats hard to believe, a 
component should respond based on its electrical rating and characteristics 
not whether it is mount thru or on the pcb.

Any thoughts comments or remarks feel free????!!!!!!!


Thanks,
SAK

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2