 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 07 Apr 97 11:07:59 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Xdx8M.0.mRJ.5XIIp"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wEHmp-000BjbC; Mon, 7 Apr 97 12:00 CDT |
| Message-Id: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
ccMail Link to SMTP R6.00.01 |
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Apr 7 14: |
13:11 1997 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello TechNet!
Does anyone have any experience with No-clean flux and Flournert.
Flournert is an inert liquid, I understand, however, will it or
No-clean flux be affected by one or the other???
Flournert is used in Vapor Phase operations and potentially other
uses. Will it affect the No-clean flux or will the No-clean affect
the flournert? I guess compatibility is the word?
Are there any flournert suppliers, flux suppliers, chemists, or folks
who have got some experience in this area?? I would appreciate some
education on this subject.
Thanks
Ron H
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
