Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wDN2K-000BjFC; Fri, 4 Apr 97 22:25 CST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
CC: |
|
References: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 04 Apr 1997 20:36:15 -0800 |
From [log in to unmask] Mon Apr 7 09: |
34:38 1997 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"BduA_.0.Hi7.ZGTHp"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
X-Mailer: |
Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) |
Message-ID: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
To me, the previous posting regarding greater number of broken bits with
HTE copper suggests that it is more difficult to drill. Whether this is
due to higher Z forces through the HTE copper, or the fact that chip
formation in HTE copper is more difficult, I don't really know for
sure. Possilby it is a combination of the two that leads to higher
frequency of drill breakage.
HTE copper is a material that has higher elongation therefore is a
tougher material. The drill crush zone requires more thrust through the
copper, and the cutting edge requires a higher strain rate in order to
fracture the chips away from the copper. A copper with lower
elongation gives up its chips more easily and is more forgiving to the
chisel edge in allowing passage through the copper foil.
Paul Gould wrote:
>
> In message <[log in to unmask]>, drilbert
> <[log in to unmask]> writes
> >I thought one advantage of HTE Cu was higher reliability circuits. This
> >is what the inner layer guys tell me where I work.
> >Even though it is difficult to drill, aren't there other problems that
> >will occur if HTE Cu is not used? Can someone point out any technical
> >papers that have covered this subject? Is there independent data that
> >shows HTE Cu gives the customer a better product?
>
> I was not aware that it was any more difficult to drill. Can anyone
> explain why?
>
> The reason for HTE foil on inner layers is to prevent cracking due to
> the elongation stresses from thermal expansion. Standard foil is more
> brittle and will crack at relatively low elongations. HTE foil can
> withstand much greater elongation and is equivalent to the plated copper
> in the holes. The stress increases the further away from the centre of
> the hole you go so it is more important on thicker laminates.
>
> I have seen cracking on inner layers running back into the foil after
> thermal shock testing through 5 cycles, but the cracks are difficult to
> see. Chances are they would not cause a problem but who wants to take
> that chance. If you have fine traces running into holes with minimum
> land it could cause failure if someone uses a really hot soldering iron
> out in the field.
>
> We used to specify HTE before it became standard. Now all multi-layer
> laminates are HTE clad and there is no price difference.
>
> Regards
> Paul Gould
>
> ***************************************************************************
> * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
> ***************************************************************************
> * To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
> * with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
> ***************************************************************************
> * If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
> * Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
> ***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|