 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 15 Apr 97 9:12 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| Content-description: |
Message Body |
| TO: |
|
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wHA8J-000BlSC; Tue, 15 Apr 97 10:26 CDT |
| Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Apr 15 10: |
33:08 1997 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Y4Bi91.0.NSH.0vvKp"@ipc> |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello,
We are in the process of manufacturing a very simple board assembly. The
material requirements for the board material are described in the customer
drawing as G-10. The material supplier originally certified the material as
FR4, when questioned as to the equivalency of these materials our supplier
simply "doctored" the certification by adding G-10 in parentheses after the
FR4. Without a full blown investigation of the supporting specifications,
which I don't have readily available, could someone simply answer, are these
two different designators for the same material?
Thank You
Darrell Bonzo
EDO Corporation
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
