TECHNET Archives

March 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"ddsulliv" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 07 Mar 97 07:13:44 cst
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (116 lines)
          I agree with Dougal.  I've tried this before and it gets out 
          of hand very rapidly.  There is too much variation in the 
          incoming laminate (no reflection on our laminate supply 
          brethren) to run SPC on permanganate weight loss.  Plus, if 
          you have an automatic line, getting down line to pull off 
          the coupon is something the operator will want to do 
          reluctantly at best.
          
          My suggestion of things to control on a permanganate bath 
          are:
          
          1.   Permanganate concentration
          2.   Caustic concentration
          3.   Manganate levels
          4.   Total solids
          5.   Temperature
          
          I assume you are using electrolytic permanganate 
          regeneration.  If you aren't, then I do not believe you will 
          be able to control this process as it degenerates too 
          rapidly, which may be (I guess) why you would want to 
          control by weight loss.  Follow Dougal's suggestion.  It is 
          the only way to achieve control of this process.
          
          Regards,
          
          Dave Sullivan
          Rockwell Collins, Inc.
          
          [log in to unmask]


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: DESMEAR FOLLOW-UP                                           
Author:  [log in to unmask] at ccmgw1
Date:    3/7/97 6:57 AM


          
Edward Szpruch wrote:
We intend to upgrade our follow - up in desmear process and
implement SPC . We intend to perform weight-loss measurements on uncladed 
laminates .
 What are the most common figures for FR-4 and modified resins such as 
 FR-405 ?
          
Edward, we used to run SPC on weight loss at desmear, but you have to 
be very careful, because you will find that every time you change the 
batch or supplier of laminate used for your weight loss panels, the 
SPC goes into an out of control situation, and the line starts running 
above or below the previous average. This is because of the variation 
in surface resin on the laminate, and it is this surface resin that is
attacked by the permanganate. The other issue is that you cannot re-use 
the coupon, as the surface resin is removed and so the permanganate is 
now trying to remove resin from between the glass bundles.
 The real key is to use the weight loss panel as a measure during a
DOE to establish the critical factors in the process (incl.sweller) 
and then run SPC on those parameters, not the product attributes.
          
Dougal Stewart
Exacta Circuits
Scotland
          
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   * 
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          * 
*************************************************************************** 
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   * 
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      * 
***************************************************************************
          

Received: from  by ccmgw1.cacd.rockwell.com (SMTPLINK V2.11)
    ; Fri, 07 Mar 97 06:57:21 cst
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from stealth.cacd.rockwell.com (stealth) by mailserv with ESMTP
    (1.40.112.8/16.2) id AA165939442; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 06:57:22 -0600
Received: by stealth.cacd.rockwell.com; id GAA10360; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 06:55:35 -0600
Received: from unknown(168.113.24.64) by stealth.cacd.rockwell.com via smap (V3.1.1)
    id xma010354; Fri, 7 Mar 97 06:55:05 -0600
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
     id GAA08037; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 06:45:19 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 06:45:19 -0800
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
    id m0w2ygE-000BC5C; Fri, 7 Mar 97 06:23 CST
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
From: [log in to unmask]
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 1997 07:32:44 EST
To: [log in to unmask]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: DESMEAR FOLLOW-UP                                                                                                            
Resent-Message-Id: <"z83Ez.0.YZK.rY08p"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/10921
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2