Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Mon, 31 Mar 1997 22:45:10 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As requested attached please find a copy of an incoming message as received from IPC
Tech-Net. This message arrived with no dificulties. Perhaps something within the message
will help to determine the cause of the problem I have been experiencing. If there is anything
else that I can provide to help please feel free to ask.
Sincerely,
Daniel Belisle
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
From: INTERNET:[log in to unmask], INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
TO: Dan Lorinser, INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
CC: (unknown), INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
(unknown), INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
DATE: 1/23/97 11:24 AM
RE: Re: IPC-RB-276 is OBSOLETE! -Reply -Reply
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Received: from simon.ipc.org ([168.113.24.64]) by hil-img-4.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515)
id LAA11727; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 11:20:10 -0500
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
id KAA13056; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 10:01:01 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 10:01:01 -0800
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vnQr0-0000amC; Thu, 23 Jan 97 09:14 CST
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <bergda>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:14:07 -0600 (CST)
From: David Bergman <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: IPC-RB-276 is OBSOLETE! -Reply -Reply
To: Dan Lorinser <[log in to unmask]>
cc: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9701230901.E29874-0100000@ipc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"yE2fb1.0.YkK.21uvo"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/9525
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Dan, 2221/2 will supersede IPC-D-275 when published. 2221 is generic pwb
design and will support rigid/flex/mcml/pcmcia/discrete wire, etc. 2222
is rigid pwb sectional document.
Dave Bergman
On Thu, 23 Jan 1997, Dan Lorinser wrote:
> Sorry...One more question...WHAT THE HECK IS IPC-2221/2?
> Also, I talked to my PCB fabricator and they told me to STAY with 276
> untill THEY review/approve 6011/2 and use it.
> Dan Lorinser
> BFGoodrich Aerospace
>
>
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|