TECHNET Archives

March 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0w8Bt4-000BCbC; Fri, 21 Mar 97 15:30 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 21 Mar 1997 15:42:08 -0800
Precedence:
list
Reply-To:
Mike Wolverton <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7Bit
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/11286
X-Status:
X-BeyondMail-Priority:
1
TO:
From [log in to unmask] Fri Mar 21 17:
22:15 1997
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Loop:
Resent-From:
Conversation-Id:
X-Receipt-From-Agent:
true
Resent-Message-ID:
<"aC16b2.0.3ED.YtlCp"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Mike Wolverton <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
X-Mailer:
BeyondMail for Windows/Professional 2.3
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (133 lines)
	Gold embrittlement is well understood, but not widely understood.	

	The good news is, the risk of gold embrittlement has been quantified.
It is a function of the solder density and the allowable (maximum) percent
gold. The maximum ratio of gold finish thickness to solder alloy thickness can
be calculated, to help prevent a problem from excessive gold-tin (i.e., AuSn4)
compound. For the equation and its derivation, please refer to a paper of mine,
"The Use of Capillary Action Measurements for Solderability Improvement,"
Soldering and Surface Mount Technology, No. 9, Oct., 1991, Wela Publications,
Ayr, Scotland, Table 5.

	It is interesting to note, The Embrittlement culprit, AuSn4 is 29
weight percent gold. So even if one had 100% tin as the solder alloy and 10%
gold were dissolved into the solder, then about a third of the solder joint
would be rocks (i.e., compound) and the remainder would be soft solder. Do not
count on the rocks to bond to the solderable surface. Hence most
recommendations I have seen have been in the 3 to 5 weight % gold range for the
maximum allowable percent.

	Gold is dissolved by molten tin based solder, but the gold does not go
into solution (i.e., the result is not a solid solution). For more details on
the mechanism and explanation, please refer to a paper of mine: "Understanding
Gold Embrittlement in Surface-Mount Soldering," ISHM's 1st Joint Technology
Conference, San Diego, March, 1990 (//WWW.ISHM.EE.VT.EDU). Incidentally, ISHM
changed its name to IMAPS, (703) 758-1060.

The above represents my own view, and not necessarily that of my employer.	

---------------------------------------------------
Mike Wolverton
Texas Instruments 
[log in to unmask]

------------------
Original text

From: "ddhillma" <[log in to unmask]>, on 3/20/97 5:50 PM:
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc: [log in to unmask]

     Hi Tom -
     
     The words gold embrittlement really mean job security for 
     metallurgists! You would think that as well researched and 
     investigated the gold embrittlement mechanics of failure has been over 
     the last 20 years we would stop making the same mistakes. Two rules of 
     thumb to follow:
     
     a) Is there enough solder volume to allow the gold to uniformly go 
     into solution?
     
     b) Is the soldering operation of sufficient temperature and time to 
     allow (a) to occur?
     
     The thickness of the gold finish isn't the only deciding factor of 
     having a solder joint embrittled by gold/tin intermetallics - the 
     process is equally important. Also, you can avoid the whole gold 
     embrittlement issue by keeping the gold below 10 microinches but you 
     then have to deal with poor solderability on the components if this 
     thin gold plating is of poor quality (and plating a quality gold 
     finish below 20 microinches requires good control and knowledge of 
     one's plating system). 
     
     
     Dave Hillman
     Rockwell Collins
     [log in to unmask]


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Gold Embrittlement
Author:  [log in to unmask] at ccmgw1
Date:    3/19/97 3:17 PM


To those who have heard enough of this subject I send my deepest apologies, 
but to those who still have some energy left to help a double 'E', who has 
found himself doing a lot of PCB design lately, I need to try to obtain 
some information on Gold Embrittlement.
     
My question is: 
     
Can SMT components be attached to PCB's, which are fabricated using 50 
micro inch 'Hard Cobalt Gold' over 200 micro inch low stress nickle, 
without having to worry about Gold Embrittlement, and if so, are there any 
special process steps which need to performed or monitored. We are using a 
mixed bag of SMT packages with 1mm pitch being the finest.
     
I have encountered conflicting data on this subject so far.
     
Thank you
Tom Guerriere
Staff Engineer
Controlotron Corporation
(516) 231-3600 x81
[log in to unmask]
     
     
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   * 
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          * 
*************************************************************************** 
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   * 
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      * 
***************************************************************************
     

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2