Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 25 Feb 1997 15:02:05 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Good day, TechNet -
Can't help needing to post in this time of too much traffic.
Perhaps you'll soon see why:
I've been asked to make a soldermask change on a very dense,
double-active, sensor type design. The assembly is subject
to In-Circuit-Test, and the non-test-side clearances are such
that the contract manufacturer is requesting that we tent the
testpoint vias on the non-test side. There are troubles with
solder shorts.
The board is HASL, 2x reflow, with hand solder, and an aqueous
cleaning process. The soldermask is LPI. Volumes are modest.
The via geometry is small, such that the current soldermask
appears to give a reliable covering.
The application is life support.
My fear is that one-sided tenting will allow entrapment of
processing chemistry and will not allow adequate cleaning.
It would seem to me that switching to OSP or shrinking the
via clearance to just above the finished hole size would be
a safer alternative for long term reliability.
Can a sometimes-too-conservative ol' design guy draw out any
support or denial opinions?
Thanks in advance, and regards,
--
Jeff Seeger Applied CAD Knowledge Inc
Chief Technical Officer Tyngsboro, MA 01879
[log in to unmask] 508 649 9800
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|