TECHNET Archives

February 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mirka Halas <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 06 Feb 1997 09:59:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Dear fellow designers,
                    we are in process of revising our corporate specs,
so we can achieve bigger board density.
Our present requirements are (external and internal) 0.002 inch annular
ring, except in the area adjoining the conductive trace where there
shall be 0.005 minimum annular ring.

Are there some data documenting defects or failure on boards using
anular ring 0.002 versus 0.001 or tangency?

What is yours practical experience or specs?



All help is greatly appreciated.


Mirka

[log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2