TECHNET Archives

February 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vznHr-000805C; Wed, 26 Feb 97 11:37 CST
Encoding:
5 TEXT
From [log in to unmask] Wed Feb 26 14:
37:03 1997
Date:
Wed, 26 Feb 97 11:41:00 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/10705
TO:
"'Technet'" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"xTv_y3.0.VK8.-I75p"@ipc>
Subject:
Wedge voids/Alternatives to Electroless
From:
"Nachbor, Suzanne (MN51)" <[log in to unmask]>
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
X-Mailer:
Microsoft Mail V3.0
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 

We have a number of suppliers that have looked at or switched to 
conventional electroless alternatives.  We've seen some plating voids (due 
to aspect ratio) and wedge voids.  Have others experienced this with the 
alternatives?

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2