Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 4 Feb 1997 00:48:02 +0100 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Wed Feb 5 08: |
47:55 1997 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
X-Sender: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"vPt63.0.Kj5.aOfzo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vra2o-0000V1C; Mon, 3 Feb 97 19:51 CST |
X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3 |
Message-Id: |
<199702032348.AAA17035@mbox> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I appreciate the interesting and suggestion on my project by David
Hoover,Paul Gould and Bob Holmes PhD and I hope for new opinion exchange.
Really the system can correct the outer-layer/solder files ,and the
upper/middle jig drill files(for fine pitch smd): but I think the problem
can be real if the global correction(resulting by the average of all the
layers) at limits of the board goes over +/-4 mils(*) that can be the result
of an improbable uniform behavior of all the layers(more complex lay-ups
mean smaller average-result correction). I think(but someone can tell I'm
not right!) 5 mils cannot create a mechanical mount problem but can craete a
problem in SMT automatic placement(I hope in suggestion of people with
experience in this field).
But a solution actually under simulation-test is putting intelligent
controls in
image-processing(Gerber) software,that can discriminate SMT patterns from
hole-pads in outer layers: in this case the local offset is applied only on
hole-pads but not on smt(saving connections integrity).This can solve
solder,electrical test and smt-automatic-mounting, being unvaried the global
SMT image of the board(I think an offset correction is normally applied on
smt-automatic-mounting) ,naturally in not-abnormal shrinkage condition.
Thanks for any answer,
(*) in a typical 25 mils pad with a 15 mils hole, a 4 mils offset results in a
1 mil annular-ring on external layer that's better than an annular ring
loss in some inner-layers.But i know italian and european rule-project
limits and I would like to know more about U.S.A (in real normal
production project).
Luca Marchese
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|