TECHNET Archives

January 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 2 Jan 1997 11:18:22 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
     Address,
     
     Happy new year for all those that have returned.  I know I had a 
     wonderful two weeks off.
     
     Component suppliers normally provide an MTBF for there components and 
     some of us (companies) are check systems for their data (are company 
     is working on ESS testing).  I have seen a gradual increase in 
     component failures as they return from the field.  
     
     HISTORY: Our assembly house does not have a controlled environment for 
     minimizing potential ESD failures (working on this to).
     
     Assuming that some of the field returns are related to ESD, how are 
     others determining that ESD reduced the MTBF?  If ESD is the root 
     cause, can it be quantitative by a percentage?
     
     Please advise,
     
     John Gulley - QA

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2