TECHNET Archives

January 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: fab SM questions
From:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 23:34:28 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
A 10:1 ratio for LPI mask versus thermal cure mask is certainly very steep
and seems to me a little excessive.

It is true that LPI masks cost more and that the processing is more
complicated. On the other hand, there tends to be less rework with LPI masks
and you should not have "mask on pads" type problems.

I would think that a 3:1 ratio would be about as bad as you should ever
expect.

Larry Fisher
Dexter Electronic Materials

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2