TECHNET Archives

January 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 14 Jan 97 16:56:06 MDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
  Phil,
  
  I read your article. It seemed to me that there is a difference btwn your 
  formula and the formulas listed in AMP "Solder Volumes for Through-Hole 
  Reflow-Compatible Connectors" 
  (http://www.amp.com/product/articles/dd66.html): 
  
  In your article, PA=(F)(PV)/stencil thickness
  In AMP,  PA=(PV-HV)/stencil thickness.  They considered solder volume in 
  the hole.
  
  Could you explain a little bit? Personally, I am inclined to the AMP 
  formula.
  
  Thanks,
  
  Yuan 
  Exabyte
  
  


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Reflow of Through-hole
Author:  [log in to unmask] at UNIXMAIL
Date:    1/14/97 3:40 PM


Regarding Thad McMillan's request for information on the ever-lively topic of
Reflow of Through-hole (ROT) also known as Paste In Pin, Pin In Paste,
Intrusive Soldering, Single Center Reflow, and other terms, Joe Belmonte
(MPM) and I did an article in the September, 1996 edition of Circuits
Assembly Magazine on the subject.  It was based upon Joe's experiences at
Motorola (Codex) and mine at GSS/Array as well as work I've done with clients
in this specific area.  We gave specific formulas that we have used and I
recommend taking a look at it if this is an area of interest to you.
I received a lot of feedback on the article.  A number of folks have done
reliability work including generating pull and shear strength data
(specifically, Tektronics shared some experiences with me).  For most
applications, even if the fillet is convex, there is usually more than ample
bonding area.  We are used to the mountain of solder for through-hole from
traditional means of soldering them (wave and hand).  All of that solder is
likely unnecessary.  Even if there is a certain degree of voiding within the
barrel.  However, all applications are not the same and I recommend that you
know what your requirements are and what environment the product will live in
before you undertake ROT.

Phil Zarrow, ITM Inc.

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2