Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jan 1997 11:51:01 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
> Bilal Khalaf wrote:
> >
> > Dear Techies,
> >
> > Is there a significant advantage in using ARCS instead of 45 degree
> > angles when routing traces?
> > Advantages in inductance/resistance.... you know the usual.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > bilal
>
In "normal" designs you should see very little difference
between right angles, 45 degrees, or arcs. Fabricators have
voiced dislike of 90 degree routing, though.
In very high energy conductors there is some benefit to arcs.
I've been told that current density (high-amp applications)
tends to flow to the inside of a corner, much like the apex
of a corner in auto racing; rounding this geometry with arcs
can help. I've also been told that high-voltage lines are
much more immune to issuing a spark if the conductor is
rounded.
In very high-speed differential structures, the use of con-
centric arcs can keep the diff pair at exactly uniform spacing.
We apply this technique when exceeding 600 mhz.
Regards,
--
Jeff Seeger Applied CAD Knowledge Inc
Chief Technical Officer Tyngsboro, MA 01879
[log in to unmask] 508 649 9800
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|