Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jan 1997 09:59:21 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bilal Khalaf wrote:
>
> Dear Techies,
>
> Is there a significant advantage in using ARCS instead of 45 degree
> angles when routing traces?
> Advantages in inductance/resistance.... you know the usual.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> bilal
As far as a 5 inch trace (for example) be it arc,
45 degree, or 90 degree the inductance/inch
and resistance/inch of a trace doesn't care.
If you're asking for a significant difference,
then it's a wash.
Expanding beyond this can get pretty hairy and alot
of rocket science has gone into this topic.
Suppose crosstalk needs to be minimized between
traces. No matter what geometry is chosen, if the traces
are physically very close to one another, then again,
it won't matter. They'll still crosstalk.
There's been much discussion in the past on this topic
and I'm sure someone out there can shed some more light.
*******************************************************
-------------------------------------------------------
The comments and opinions stated herein are mine alone,
and do not reflect those of my employer.
-------------------------------------------------------
*******************************************************
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|