Is somebody really providing any type of pulse plating 
          still??  I thought those things proved to not work YEARS 
          ago.  This was so long ago, I forgot what (so called) 
          advantages they were supposed to provide over standard 
          rectification.
          
          I remember the R&D director at one shop trying to run pulse 
          plating on gold, and he blew up three rectifiers in one day 
          with his attempt.
          
          Am I right in this, or has someone finally got this process 
          to work?
          
          Dave Sullivan
          Rockwell Collins, Inc.
          
          [log in to unmask]


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: reverse pulse plating system
Author:  [log in to unmask] at ccmgw1
Date:    1/23/97 6:00 AM


  we are planning to install a reverse pulse plating system in our pattern
plating line in place of conventional pal-pattern plating system.
          
  may we have feed back from the pcb manufacturers who are using this system
in their pattern plating line w.r.t. the advantages viz., plating 
time,feasibility and uniform plating.
          
          
  with regards.
          
   r.k. sharma.
          
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           * 
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        * 
*************************************************************************** 
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   * 
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      * 
***************************************************************************
          

Received: from  by ccmgw1.cacd.rockwell.com (SMTPLINK V2.11)
    ; Thu, 23 Jan 97 06:00:44 cst
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from stealth.cacd.rockwell.com (stealth) by mailserv with ESMTP
    (1.40.112.8/16.2) id AA047110846; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 06:00:46 -0600
Received: by stealth.cacd.rockwell.com; id GAA24430; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 06:00:22 -0600
Received: from unknown(168.113.24.64) by stealth via smap (V3.1.1)
    id xma024425; Thu, 23 Jan 97 05:59:55 -0600
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
     id FAA11942; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 05:50:53 -0800
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 05:50:53 -0800
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
    id m0vnNes-0000UPC; Thu, 23 Jan 97 05:49 CST
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
From: [log in to unmask]
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 17:34:25 +0500
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Sender: [log in to unmask] (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Priority: 1 (Highest)
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: reverse pulse plating system
Resent-Message-Id: <"PAF5E3.0.tPM.61rvo"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/9514
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************